TransCanada Monday defended the current route for its Keystone XL pipeline project in response to an earlier call by seven US senators who want the US State Department to consider new routes.
"The route we have chosen is the shortest route, which means the least environmental impact and the fewest landowners impacted," TransCanada spokesman Terry Cunha said in an email on Monday.
"Our focus was to reduce the overall footprint of the route by avoiding environmental, engineering and economic impacts," Cunha said. "Route choices also took into account potential impacts on wildlife, archaeological resources, aboriginal settlements, crops and protected areas."
The Keystone XL project, a 1,661-mile-long pipeline, would begin at Hardisty, Alberta, then head to Saskatchewan, Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska. It would then incorporate a portion of the existing Keystone Pipeline through Nebraska and Kansas to serve markets at Cushing, Oklahoma, before continuing through Oklahoma to a delivery point near existing terminals along the Texas Gulf Coast. Capacity along the line will vary by segment, from 500,000 b/d-700,000 b/d. The entire Keystone project would span nine states. The bi-national pipeline needs a permit from the State Department.
In a July 17 letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the senators asked that the State Department "more thoroughly analyze alternate routes for Keystone XL that minimize the length of pipeline in the US and avoid the fragile Sandhills region of the Ogallala Aquifer." The aquifer is one of the world's largest, covering eight states.
The senators, all Democrats, are Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Barbara Boxer of California, Ron Wyden of Oregon, Robert Menenedez and Frank Lautenberg, both of New Jersey, and Ben Cardin of Maryland.
Menendez spokesman Hal Connolly said in an email on Monday that "the senator's interest [in Keystone] stems from his concerns about oil exploration and transportation safety."
The senators said that state's supplemental draft environmental impact statement, or SDEIS, fails to include analysis "specific to the environmental impacts of diluted bitumen spills, or the safety risks associated with the interaction of diluted bitumen with pipeline material."
They asked if the State Department intended to work with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration to conduct a "scientific and technical assessment of the safety risks specifically associated with diluted bitumen?"
The senators asked how the State Department intends to address safety concerns raised by the Environmental Protection Agency. The agency "raised concerns regarding the lack of information on the number and location of mainline valves to isolate pipeline segments in the case of a spill, the behavior of the class of crude oil in a spill, and the types of diluents that will be used to reduce the viscosity of the bitumen and their potential impact in a spill," the letter said, and then asked how State plans to address EPA's concerns.
In his email, TransCanada's Cunha said the company has "worked with PHMSA and voluntarily agreed to 57 new procedures to even greater confidence regarding the operation and monitoring of this pipeline, including a higher number of remotely controlled shutoff valves, increased pipeline inspections and pipe that is buried deeper in the ground."
"The SDEIS further concluded that incorporation of the 57 PHMSA Special Conditions 'would result in a Project that would have a degree of safety over any other typically constructed domestic oil pipeline system under current code,'" Cunha said.
A State Department spokeswoman said Monday the department had received the senators' letter but she did not know if Clinton had read it.
Cunha cited a broad coalition in favor of the Keystone XL project, including four trade associations, 24 US mayors, and 14 US senators.
